Stolen (Not Super) Intelligence: Why Congress Must Stop Big AI From Ripping Off Creators (Guest Column)
Categoria: Musica
Big Tech has built AI on stolen intelligence, and Trump’s DOJ is helping them get away with it.
Por Billboard | 13/11/2026
For over 30 years, I’ve had the privilege of sitting on the House Judiciary Committee, and one of my priorities has been to ensure that the most powerful companies are held to account for ripping off Americans. As we grapple with fast-moving technological change, lawmakers must be vigilant that new technologies do not create new socio-economic harms. Sadly, some of the largest and wealthiest AI companies are running roughshod over intellectual property (IP) rights. Far from being “super intelligence” — as President Trump calls it — when you look at how these models are trained, they can more fittingly be described as “stolen intelligence.” There are currently dozens of lawsuits in the U.S. and around the world alleging that AI companies have violated copyright by training their models on millions of articles, songs, books, voice recordings, videos and other creative content without permission and without payment. Related The Elvis AI Lawsuit, Explained CL Signs With THEBLACKLABEL, Reuniting With Longtime Producer Teddy For 'Full Circle' Moment Severe Weather, Radius Clauses and Finding the Next Generation of Festival Headliners: 'It's a Year-by-Year Fight to Stay Alive' The outcome of these lawsuits will have far-reaching ramifications. Worryingly, Trump’s Department of Justice is trying to put its finger on the scale, siding with billionaires in Silicon Valley against the creative and cultural beating heart of America, made up of thousands of journalists, authors, artists, actors, songwriters and musicians. Last month, the DOJ filed a brief in the New York Times v. Microsoft and OpenAI in support of Microsoft and OpenAI. The Times alleges that Microsoft and OpenAI copied millions of its articles to train ChatGPT. Recently unsealed court filings show that a senior Microsoft scientist privately described the practice as “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions,” yet Donald Trump and his hand-picked lawyers argue that the clear evidence of market harm isn’t theft, but “fair use.” While just one filing, AI developers everywhere may try to use the Trump Administration’s argument to defend the practice of mass intellectual property theft. It’s not just the free press that’s under attack. Just look at the music industry. Suno, the most widely used AI music generator, is being sued by major record labels for training its model on their recordings without permission. Like OpenAI, Suno claims this is “fair use,” despite admitting in court that it trained on essentially all music files of reasonable quality accessible on the open internet. If the DOJ’s argument takes hold, Suno will have every reason to keep doing it. Related Reservoir Sues Suno & Anthropic in Latest Lawsuits Over AI Music: ‘Meant to Replace the Artists’ We’re already seeing widespread market harm from Stolen Intelligence across the creative sector. Anyone streaming musi